Brandon Nakashima vs Juncheng Shang Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 17 Sep at 05:17 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
B. Nakashima vs J. Shang

USA
1
Win
Played
0
Win

CHN
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Nakashima 1 - 0 Shang
They have played 2 sets in total, with Brandon Nakashima winning 2 and Juncheng Shang winning 0. The last match between Brandon Nakashima and Juncheng Shang was at the Chengdu Open - Chengdu, 19-09-2025, Round: R2, Surface: Hard, with Brandon Nakashima getting the victory 7-5 6-3.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Nakashima | 1 |
| Shang | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R2) Chengdu Open - Chengdu(09-19-25)
B. Nakashima vs J. Shang H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $3,667,225 | Career Prize Money | $1,418,250 |
| 60.66% (259-168) | Career Total W/L | 60.99% (136-87) |
| 1 | Hard | 0 |
| 8 | Titles | 6 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 54.24% (32-27) | YTD Win/Loss | 42.86% (6-8) |
B. Nakashima vs J. Shang Match Preview:
- Shang has a slightly lower second serve win rate (44.81%) compared to Nakashima (48.28%). Could this indicate a potential weakness for Shang?
- In recent return game stats, Shang outperforms Nakashima by winning 44.65% of their opponent's second serve points, compared to Nakashima's 43.51%.
- When returning first serves, Shang (25.34%) takes a slight edge over Nakashima (23.89%), indicating potential superiority in return games.
- Under pressure, Nakashima excels in saving breakpoints, with a higher success rate of 60.07% versus Shang’s 48.15%.
- Nakashima has a marginally better overall match win rate (50.82%) compared to Shang’s 48% over the past year, suggesting a more consistent performance.
- Shang thrives on Hard courts with a win rate of 65%, whereas Nakashima performs best on Indoor hard courts with a 70% win rate.
- Both players primarily compete on the Main tour, with Shang winning 56.25% and Nakashima 54.29% of their Main tour matches over the last year.
- The average opponent rank faced by Shang (74.2) is slightly lower than Nakashima’s (71.67), hinting at similar levels of competition.
- In deciding sets, Shang is more successful, winning 63% compared to Nakashima's 41%, suggesting potential strength in closely contested matches.
- Shang needs to improve breakpoint conversion, achieving 26.47% against Nakashima's 33.13% for a possibly significant advantage.
Editorial Prediction (September 17, 2025, UTC):
The upcoming match between Shang and Nakashima promises to be closely contested, with each player showing distinct strengths and potential vulnerabilities.
Nakashima demonstrates a slight advantage with a better second serve success rate and a higher breakpoint conversion percentage, indicating a possible upper hand in service games.
However, Shang holds advantages in return games and deciding sets, which could be pivotal in high-pressure scenarios and lead to potential success if the match extends.
Given these considerations, Nakashima is slightly favored to win, owing to his consistent overall performance and breakpoint conversion success.
Brandon Nakashima vs Juncheng Shang Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
B. Nakashima vs J. Shang H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 13 | Games Won | 8 |
| 13 | Aces (Total) | 6 |
| 1:41:48 | Average Match Time | 1:41:48 |
| 78% (56/72) | 1st Serve % | 67% (45/67) |
| 73% (41/56) | 1st Serve Win % | 60% (27/45) |
| 50% (8/16) | 2nd Serve Win % | 64% (14/22) |
| 33% (3/9) | Break Pts Won % | 14% (1/7) |
| 39% (26/67) | Return Points Win % | 32% (23/72) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
B. Nakashima Recent Matches Played
J. Shang Recent Matches Played

B. Nakashima vs J. Shang Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 60.66% (259/168) | YTD Win/Loss | 60.99% (136/87) |
| 58.88% (623/435) | Sets Win/Loss | 57.58% (319/235) |
| 53.00% (5562/4933) | Games Win/Loss | 51.88% (2824/2619) |
| 60.48% (127/83) | Hard Win/Loss | 63.56% (75/43) |
| 50.00% (35/35) | Clay Win/Loss | 63.33% (38/22) |
| 68.37% (67/31) | Indoor Hard W/L | 40.91% (9/13) |
| 61.22% (30/19) | Grass Win/Loss | 60.87% (14/9) |
| 0.57 | Aces Per Game | 0.28 |
| 2952 | Aces Total | 736 |
| 0.14 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.22 |
| 711 | Total Double Faults | 583 |
| 1:46:52 | Average Match Time | 1:53:35 |
| 176.96 | Average Opponent Rank | 301.19 |
| 64% (20168/31577) | 1st Serve % | 64% (10912/17064) |
| 74% (15012/20168) | 1st Serve Win % | 70% (7603/10912) |
| 54% (6161/11409) | 2nd Serve Win % | 52% (3221/6152) |
| 38% (1022/2721) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 41% (637/1551) |
| 37% (12068/32789) | Return Points Win % | 38% (6381/16927) |
| 48.89% (22/23) | Slam W/L | 58.33% (14/10) |
| 47.69% (31/34) | Masters W/L | 45.16% (14/17) |
| 100.00% (3/0) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 59.24% (93/64) | Main Tour W/L | 59.65% (34/23) |
| 69.40% (93/41) | Challenger W/L | 60.49% (49/32) |
| 73.91% (17/6) | Futures W/L | 83.33% (25/5) |
| 61% (229/377) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 64% (129/203) |
| 57% (26/46) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 40% (6/15) |
| 55% (135/247) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 55% (59/108) |
| 50% (67/135) | Deciding Set Win % | 61% (54/88) |
| 85% (261/223) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 83% (140/116) |
| 15% (261/38) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 17% (140/24) |
| 21% (165/34) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 25% (83/21) |